Vascular calcification by conventional X-ray and mortality in a cohort of predominantly African descent hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: There is a lack of studies describing the prevalence of vascular calcification (VC) and its association with mortality in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients of African descent. We investigated if a VC score based on the number of calcified vascular beds was associated with mortality in MHD patients. METHODS: We analyzed data from 211 MHD patients enrolled from January 2010 to January 2011 in the prospective cohort study, "The Prospective Study of the Prognosis of Chronic Hemodialysis Patients (PROHEMO)," developed in Salvador, BA, Brazil. VC was evaluated using radiographs of the hands, abdomen, hip, and chest; the score was calculated by the number of calcified sites as 0 (absence of calcification), 1 (one calcified site), 2 (two sites), 3 (⩾3 sites). We used Cox's regression to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of associations between VC and mortality with adjustments for age and comorbidities. RESULTS: VC was detected in 114 (54.0%) patients; 37 (17.5%) with a VC score = 1; 21 (10%) with VC score = 2 and 56 (26.5%) with VC score = 3. Compared with VC score = 0, the adjusted hazard of death was 2.67 (95% CI: 1.12, 6.33) for patients with VC score = 1; HR = 2.89 (95% CI: 0.95, 7.63) for VC score = 2; and HR = 3.27 (95% CI: 1.47, 7.28) for VC score = 3. CONCLUSION: The present study in an African descent MHD population provides support for the VC score based on conventional radiography as a prediction tool for the clinical practice. As shown, the VC score was monotonically and independently associated with mortality.

Sex-age-specific handgrip strength and mortality in an incident hemodialysis cohort: The risk explained by nutrition and comorbidities.

OBJECTIVE:: To investigate associations of sex-age-specific handgrip strength by a dynamometer with all-cause mortality and the percent excess risk explained (%ERE) by comorbidities and nutritional indicators in incident maintenance hemodialysis patients. METHODS:: Prospective cohort of 413 adult patients (165 women, 248 men, 299 <60 years and 114 ⩾60 years) with <6 months (82% <3 months) on dialysis enrolled in PROHEMO in Salvador, Brazil. Low and high handgrip strength groups were based on sex-age-specific cutoffs (17.8 kg for women <60 years, 13.8 kg for women ⩾60 years, 29.5 kg for men <60 years, and 21.9 kg for men ⩾60 years). We used Cox regression to estimate the mortality hazard ratio. The %ERE was determined by the equation (HR1 - HR2)/(HR1 - 1) × 100, in which HR1 represented the hazard ratio in a model with a smaller number of covariates and HR2 represented the hazard ratio in a subsequent model with the inclusion of new covariates plus the variables included in the previous model. RESULTS:: The mortality hazard ratio comparing low and high handgrip strength was 2.58 (95% confidence interval: 1.73, 3.85) in the model with sociodemographic factors and vintage and 2.25 (95% confidence interval: 1.49, 3.43) with addition of comorbidities, corresponding to a %ERE of 21%. The hazard ratio was 1.98 (95% confidence interval: 1.29, 3.06) after addition of nutritional indicators corresponding to %ERE of 38%. Results stratified by age and gender followed similar patterns. CONCLUSION:: These results provide support for the assessment of handgrip strength in all maintenance hemodialysis patients for early identification of those who may require special care to improve nutritional status and survival.

Associations of physical activity energy expenditure with nutritional-inflammatory markers in hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Sedentariness, high inflammation status and malnutrition are highly prevalent in end-stage kidney disease patients on maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). This study investigated associations of weekly physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) with clinical and anthropometric markers of nutrition and inflammation. METHODS: The analysis was performed using baseline cross-sectional data of 640 patients enrolled in the prospective cohort "The Prospective Study of the Prognosis of Patients Treated Chronically by Hemodialysis" (PROHEMO) developed in Salvador, BA, Brazil. The long version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire was used to determine a summary measure of PAEE, the metabolic equivalent of task (MET), taking into account physical activities related to occupation, recreation, travel, sports, and housework. PAEE was the predictor variable. To assess associations of PAEE with outcomes, the sex-age-specific median MET was used. The malnutrition-inflammation score (MIS) with range of 0 to 30 (higher is worse), conicity index as indicator of abdominal adiposity and C-reactive protein (CRP) were the nutritional-inflammatory outcomes. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 48.9 ± 13.8 y, 60.3% were males, 16.7% diabetic, 88.1% nonwhite. In multivariable logistic regression models with adjustments for sociodemographic variables and comorbidities, PAEE ≤median was associated with MIS ≥6 (odds ratio [OR] = 1.57; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.08, 2.29), conicity index ≥1.3 (OR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.03, 2.23) and CRP >1.30 mg/dL (OR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.08, 2.84). CONCLUSIONS: Greater physical activity assessed by PAEE was associated with indicators of better nutritional and inflammation status. These results indicate opportunities for improving outcomes in MHD patients by counseling and treatment intervention.

Coping with fluid restriction and the quality of life in hemodialysis patients with very low or no daily urine output.

PURPOSE: Fluid restriction is crucial to prevent circulatory overload in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients with very low urine volume, but fluid restriction may result in psychological distress. We studied MHD patients with urine volume ≤ 200 ml/day to investigate if their acceptance of fluid restriction was associated with their health-related quality of life (HRQOL). METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 271 Brazilian adult MHD patients enrolled in the Prospective Study of the Prognosis of Chronic Hemodialysis Patients (PROHEMO). To assess the acceptance of fluid restriction, patients were asked about the extent of feeling bothered by living on this restriction. The KDQOL was used to determine HRQOL scores. Higher scores indicate better HRQOL with differences of >3.0 points considered clinically significant. RESULTS: 52.4% reported being "moderately to extremely" bothered by fluid restriction and had lower scores for all HRQOL scales than patients less bothered by fluid restriction. The largest covariate-adjusted differences in HRQOL were 19.5 for emotional role (p<0.001), 15.1 for emotional well-being (p<0.001), and 14.1 for vitality (p<0.001). Adjusted differences were larger for mental component (7.53 points, p<0.001) than for physical component (2.07, p = 0.075) summaries. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that MHD patients with a lower level of acceptance of fluid restriction have poorer HRQOL, particularly in mental domains of HRQOL. The high prevalence of poor acceptance of fluid restriction in the present study underscores the need for interventions to improve acceptance of fluid restriction and determine if such interventions improve HRQOL of MHD patients with very low urine volume.